-
The city will pay $100,000 in a lawsuit that alleged City Council maps were racially gerrymandered.
-
Jacksonville City Council will consider whether to accept a court-ordered map and pay the plaintiffs' legal fees.
-
The move indicates Jacksonville may be on the verge of settling with the NAACP and other plaintiffs.
-
The city has potentially paid over $150,000 in fees to outside law firms and consultants in its attempts to draw and defend Jacksonville City Council district maps.
-
A federal appeals panel, in a 2-to-1 decision, upheld an order requiring the city to use City Council districts drawn by plaintiffs in a federal redistricting case.
-
U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard waived a requirement that candidates in some districts live there for six months.
-
Jacksonville's redistricting plan remains undecided, so the city wants a judge to let candidates run for any district.
-
A judge tossed out the city's earlier maps, saying they did not resolve decades of racial gerrymandering.
-
U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard ruled Monday that the council’s latest redistricting map didn’t fix what she considered racial gerrymandering.
-
U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Howard ruled against the city of Jacksonville on Monday evening when she rejected City Council districts submitted by the city in favor of a map drawn by a group of residents and voting rights organizations suing the city.